Court refuses to close trial of FC Torpedo co-owner Sobolev
In short
A Russian court refused a defence request to hold closed proceedings in the case of Sobolev, a co-owner of the football club Torpedo, according to TASS and RIA Novosti. The prosecution had objected to the defence motion, TASS reported. Neither outlet said what the case concerns.
Read the full story 1 min read
A court refused to close the proceedings in the case of Sobolev, a co-owner of the football club Torpedo, TASS and RIA Novosti reported. The ruling left the hearing open to the public. [ 1 , 2 ]
TASS reported that the prosecution had objected to the defence request for the process to be closed, and that the court declined to grant it. The state agency's report gave no further detail on the case, and RIA Novosti's report consisted of the headline alone. Neither outlet said what Sobolev is accused of, which court issued the ruling or where the hearing took place. [ 1 , 2 ]
Why it matters
The ruling keeps the case against a co-owner of a professional football club open to the public, which is the outcome the prosecution sought. Because the two reports come from state news agencies and describe only the procedural ruling, the wider significance of the case cannot be assessed from the documents available.
Key facts
- A court declined to close the proceedings in the case of Sobolev, a co-owner of the football club Torpedo. [ 1 , 2 ]
- The defence had asked for the trial to be held behind closed doors. [ 1 ]
- The prosecution objected to the defence motion, TASS reported. [ 1 ]
- TASS reported the ruling at 11:06 local time and RIA Novosti at 11:24 local time. [ 1 , 2 ]
Confirmed by several sources
Still unclear
- What the case against Sobolev concerns, and what he is accused of. Neither document states the substance of the case; both carry only the headline and, in one case, a one-line summary of the procedural ruling.
- Which court issued the ruling and where it sat. The documents do not name the court or the location of the hearing.
- Whether other defendants are involved and whether the trial has already begun. The documents mention only the refusal to close the process and do not describe the stage of proceedings.