Local Chorus
Local news from local sources, read in your language.
Settled
Verified

Japan court again orders Susaki City to pay damages over Chiitan☆ mascot dispute

🇯🇵 Japan, Susaki 13:26 Business Business5 Official Community updated 2 d ago first reported by Yahoo!ニュース

Version 2: Additional outlets, including Tokyo Shimbun and TBS NEWS DIG, reported the ruling, with TBS describing the increased damages as exceeding 18.87 million yen; the court's reasoning and the city's response were unchanged.

In short

The Intellectual Property High Court on Oct 7 ordered Susaki City in Kochi Prefecture to pay damages for obstructing the business of the mascot character Chiitan☆, upholding the first-instance Tokyo District Court ruling. The court raised the damages from about 7.86 million yen to about 18.87 million yen. The city said it will examine the judgment and consider how to respond.

Read the full story 3 min read

The Intellectual Property High Court on Oct 7 ordered Susaki City in Kochi Prefecture to pay damages to the company operating the mascot character Chiitan☆, upholding the first-instance Tokyo District Court finding that the city had obstructed the character's business and increasing the amount. The court raised the damages from about 7.86 million yen in the first instance to about 18.87 million yen, according to Mainichi Shimbun and Yahoo! News Japan; Nishi-Nippon Shimbun described the increase as from about 7.8 million yen to about 18.8 million yen, Asahi Shimbun as an increase of about 11 million yen to about 18.8 million yen, and TBS NEWS DIG as exceeding 18.87 million yen. Nishi-Nippon Shimbun and Asahi Shimbun said the panel was presided over by Judge Mori Tomiyoshi. Mainichi reported the court dismissed the city's appeal. [ 1 , 2 , 4 , 6 , 7 ]

Shinjō-kun, an otter-themed mascot modeled on the Japanese river otter, has been used by the city in public relations since around 2002 and won the Yuru-chara Grand Prix in 2016, Mainichi and Nishi-Nippon reported. Chiitan☆ was created after an Asian small-clawed otter kept by the operating company appeared with Shinjō-kun on a television program in 2017, and videos posted on social media drew attention, Mainichi said. Nishi-Nippon and Asahi reported that Chiitan☆ was designed by the same designer as Shinjō-kun, and Nishi-Nippon and Asahi identified the operator as the talent agency Cleverlats of Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture. [ 2 , 4 , 6 ]

The two characters initially appeared together at events, but the relationship worsened after the city took issue with extreme content in Chiitan☆ videos, such as one swinging a weed trimmer, Nishi-Nippon and Asahi reported. In 2019 the city removed the model otter from its post as tourism ambassador and stated that Chiitan☆ was an unauthorized production infringing copyright, Asahi said. Mainichi reported that the city held a press conference alleging copyright infringement and that bookings for Chiitan☆, including a television commercial, were cancelled one after another. [ 2 , 4 , 6 ]

Cleverlats sued for obstruction of business, seeking about 43 million yen, Nishi-Nippon reported, while the city filed its own suit seeking an injunction on the character's use and damages, according to Mainichi. The Tokyo District Court ruled in February 2025 that the city had implicitly permitted the use, noting it had sent an email saying permission was not necessary, and ordered damages of about 4 million yen for the cancelled commercial and 2 million yen for reputational damage, Mainichi reported. The city appealed after the court rejected its injunction claim, Mainichi said. [ 2 , 4 ]

In the appeal, the high court noted that the city knew the Chiitan☆ costume would resemble Shinjō-kun but did not seek to stop its use for more than a year, and said it could not find that the character's increasingly extreme videos harmed the city, Asahi reported. It judged the city's statement that the character infringed copyright to be an act of unfair competition that damaged business credibility with false information, and recognized lost business opportunities more broadly than the first instance, according to Asahi. [ 6 ]

The city said: “Unfortunately, the city's arguments were not accepted. After receiving the judgment, we will examine its content and consider how to respond,” according to Asahi. NHK reported that a second-instance court, which it described as the Tokyo High Court, ordered the city to pay damages, while other outlets named the Intellectual Property High Court. [ 5 , 6 ]

Why it matters

The ruling upholds a finding that a municipality's public statements that a character infringed copyright amounted to an act of unfair competition, and it substantially raises the sum the city must pay. It shows that statements by a local government about a private operator can carry financial consequences. The dispute is otherwise domestic and centred on two local mascot characters, with limited relevance outside Japan.

Key facts

  • The Intellectual Property High Court ruled on Oct 7 that Susaki City must pay damages over obstructing the business of the mascot character Chiitan☆, upholding the first-instance Tokyo District Court decision and dismissing the city's appeal. [ 1 , 2 , 4 , 6 , 7 ]
  • The damages were increased from about 7.86 million yen in the first instance to about 18.87 million yen. [ 1 , 2 , 4 , 6 ]
  • The high court panel was presided over by Judge Mori Tomiyoshi. [ 4 , 6 ]
  • Chiitan☆ is operated by the talent agency Cleverlats of Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture. [ 4 , 6 ]
  • The operating company had sought about 43 million yen in damages. [ 4 ]
  • The city said it will examine the content of the judgment and consider how to respond. [ 6 ]

Confirmed by several sources

  • The Intellectual Property High Court on Oct 7 ordered Susaki City to pay damages over obstructing the business of the mascot character Chiitan☆, following the first-instance Tokyo District Court ruling, and raised the amount. [ 1 , 2 , 4 , 6 , 7 ]
  • The damages were increased from about 7.86 million yen to about 18.87 million yen. [ 1 , 2 , 4 , 6 ]
  • The high court was presided over by Judge Mori Tomiyoshi. [ 4 , 6 ]
  • Chiitan☆ is operated by the talent agency Cleverlats, based in Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture. [ 4 , 6 ]

Still unclear

  • Which high court issued the ruling NHK describes the second-instance court as the Tokyo High Court, while Mainichi, Nishi-Nippon, Asahi and TBS NEWS DIG name the Intellectual Property High Court.
  • Whether the city will appeal further The city said only that it will examine the judgment after receiving it and consider how to respond; no decision on a further appeal is reported.
  • The precise damages figure Mainichi and Yahoo! News Japan give 18.87 million yen, Nishi-Nippon and Asahi give about 18.8 million yen, and TBS NEWS DIG says the amount exceeds 18.87 million yen.

What local media are saying

Business mediaThe business outlets led with the operator's win and the increased damages, and Mainichi and Asahi carried the background of the two mascots, the district court ruling and the high court's reasoning; Nishi-Nippon noted the roughly 43 million yen sought and the complaints over Chiitan☆'s extreme videos; TBS NEWS DIG gave a short account of the second-instance ruling and the increase. [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 ]
Official sourcesNHK reported briefly that a second-instance court, which it described as the Tokyo High Court, ordered the city to pay damages, with no further detail in the available text. [ 5 ]
Community and socialYahoo! News Japan gave a short account saying the second-instance ruling upheld the damages order and increased the sum to 18.87 million yen. [ 1 ]

Timeline, local time

  1. Yahoo! News Japan reports the high court ordered the city to pay damages, raised from 7.86 million yen to 18.87 million yen. [ 1 ]
  2. Mainichi reports the ruling and details of the February 2025 Tokyo District Court decision and the city's appeal. [ 2 ]
  3. Tokyo Shimbun reports that the management company won again, with increased damages against the city. [ 3 ]
  4. Nishi-Nippon reports the company had sought about 43 million yen and that damages rose from about 7.8 million yen to about 18.8 million yen. [ 4 ]
  5. NHK reports that a second-instance court ordered the city to pay damages. [ 5 ]
  6. Asahi reports the high court's reasoning on the copyright claim and the city's comment. [ 6 ]
  7. TBS NEWS DIG reports the second-instance ruling ordering damages, which it describes as exceeding 18.87 million yen. [ 7 ]