China regulator seeks comment on draft rules to curb fund style drift
In short
A regulatory body has opened public consultation on a draft revision of the rules for publicly offered securities funds and supporting rules. Proposed clauses would require quantifiable investment ranges for funds whose names indicate a direction, split mixed funds into three types by equity position, and make performance benchmarks binding on investment behaviour.
Read the full story 1 min read
A regulatory body recently opened public consultation on a draft of the Measures for the Operation and Management of Publicly Offered Securities Investment Funds and supporting rules, according to a report by China Securities Journal carried by Yicai, Jiemian and 36Kr. Several clauses concern making the risk and return profile of products transparent. Funds whose names indicate an investment direction must define their investment scope in a quantifiable way. Mixed funds would be divided by equity position into equity-leaning, bond-leaning and other types. Performance benchmarks would be required to place a hard constraint on investment behaviour. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
Industry figures quoted in the report see the clauses as tailored to make products deliver what they show, which they say would narrow room for style drift and bring actual holdings in line with contract positioning. Yicai's version adds that the rules answer controversy over public funds whose products do not match their names and whose style boundaries are blurred. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
The report adds that the clauses go beyond renaming and reclassifying funds in contracts. Several fund industry figures said that making style stability real requires building the performance benchmark into portfolio attribution, risk warning and fund manager assessment. They also said holder notification and voting arrangements for major changes in investment strategy should be improved. The report says the revision tests whether institutions can turn the spirit of contract into daily research and investment actions. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
Why it matters
Industry figures quoted in the coverage say the clauses would narrow room for funds to drift from their stated style and bring actual holdings in line with contract positioning. They add that the effect depends on how fund managers apply the benchmark in daily research and assessment.
Key facts
- A regulatory body recently opened public consultation on a draft of the Measures for the Operation and Management of Publicly Offered Securities Investment Funds and supporting rules. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
- Funds whose names indicate an investment direction must define their investment scope in a quantifiable way. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
- Mixed funds would be divided by equity position into equity-leaning, bond-leaning and other types. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
- Performance benchmarks would be required to place a hard constraint on investment behaviour. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
- The clauses respond to controversy over funds whose products do not match their names and whose style boundaries are blurred. [ 1 ]
Confirmed by several sources
- Nothing is confirmed by two independent outlets yet.
Still unclear
- Which regulator issued the draft, the consultation deadline and the date the rules would take effect. The documents refer only to a regulatory body and give no deadline or effective date.
- Whether the three outlets reported independently. Document 1 cites China Securities Journal, Document 2 credits it at the end, and Document 3 credits it as Zhongzheng Bao; the texts are near identical.
- The draft Measures for the Operation and Management of Publicly Offered Securities Investment Funds and supporting rules are out for public comment, with clauses on quantifiable investment scope, three types of mixed fund and binding performance benchmarks. Reported by a single source so far
- Fund industry figures said that making style stability real requires building the benchmark into portfolio attribution, risk warning and fund manager assessment, and improving holder notification and voting arrangements for major strategy changes. Reported by a single source so far