US Eighth Army chief in Korea says troops must be ready for missions beyond peninsula
In short
Joseph Hilbert, commander of the Eighth Army of US Forces Korea, told the South China Morning Post in an email interview that focusing "myopically" on threats on the Korean Peninsula alone is irresponsible. He said his troops must be ready to deploy outside the peninsula if ordered. Korean outlets linked the remarks to the Trump administration's push for greater flexibility for US forces in Korea.
Read the full story 3 min read
Joseph Hilbert, commander of the Eighth Army of US Forces Korea, said in an email interview with the South China Morning Post (SCMP) on 21 October that it is irresponsible for US forces in Korea to focus "myopically" only on threats on the Korean Peninsula. He also called it irresponsible to claim that forces cannot carry out other missions simply because they are stationed in Korea, and said his troops must be ready to be sent outside the peninsula if ordered. [ 1 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]
Hilbert said the Eighth Army is focused on carrying out the US defense commitment under the South Korea-US Mutual Defense Treaty, but that being stationed in Korea does not limit the missions it can perform. He described the Eighth Army as part of a "global army" trained to be deployed where national command authorities need it, and said a trained and ready unit that can carry out missions assigned by the Army can be committed to any required threat. He added that the unit trains daily with South Korean allied forces for major threats while staying ready to respond to any situation the nation requires. Newsis and Dong-A Ilbo, relaying SCMP, said he cited the Eighth Army's participation in multinational exercises in the Asia-Pacific as one example of activity beyond the peninsula. [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]
The Eighth Army is headquartered at Camp Humphreys in Pyeongtaek and commands the US ground forces in Korea. SCMP described it, according to Seoul Economic Daily, Newsis and Dong-A Ilbo, as the only US unit stationed on the Asian continent in the Asia-Pacific and the only permanently forward-deployed US field army. [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]
Several outlets placed the remarks in the context of Trump administration policy. US Forces Korea has traditionally focused on deterring North Korea, but the administration has signalled it could widen that role to other regional conflicts. The National Defense Strategy released in January says South Korea can take primary responsibility for deterring North Korea with limited US support, and sets out a strong denial defense along the first island chain running from Japan through Taiwan to the Philippines. Yonhap said the remarks could be seen as hinting at use of the Eighth Army in a Taiwan Strait contingency, and Seoul Economic Daily said they suggested mobilizing US forces in Korea in a Taiwan contingency. [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]
Rami Kim, the IISS chair for Korea, said the relationship is shifting from a "one-way" US responsibility for defending South Korea to a "more reciprocal partnership", and that South Korea will take greater responsibility for its own defense. He said South Korea is likely to provide logistics support to US forces in a regional emergency, and that its defense industrial base could help replenish US weapons stocks and sustain US operations in a prolonged conflict. Troy Stangarone, a senior fellow at the US-based Korea Economic Institute, said South Korea plays an "important role" as a logistics hub and is the only US ally in the region with a defense industrial base to support US forces in a contingency, according to Yonhap and Seoul Economic Daily. Yonhap and Seoul Economic Daily also noted that US Forces Korea commander Xavier Brunson spoke on 12 October in Washington about a regional sustainment hub concept. [ 1 , 2 , 5 , 7 ]
Why it matters
Korean outlets read the remarks as a direct statement of the Trump administration's wish to widen the role of US forces in Korea beyond deterring North Korea. Documents do not report any specific deployment or decision.
Key facts
- Eighth Army commander Joseph Hilbert said in an email interview with the South China Morning Post (SCMP), reported on 21 October, that it is irresponsible for US Forces Korea to focus "myopically" only on threats on the peninsula. [ 1 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]
- Hilbert said it is also irresponsible to claim US forces cannot carry out other missions merely because they are stationed in Korea. [ 1 , 2 , 5 ]
- He said his troops must be ready to be sent outside the Korean Peninsula if ordered. [ 1 , 2 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]
- Hilbert said the Eighth Army is part of a "global army" trained to be deployed where national command authorities need it, while it trains daily with South Korean allied forces for major threats. [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 ]
- The Eighth Army is headquartered at Camp Humphreys in Pyeongtaek and commands the US ground forces in Korea. [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]
- The US National Defense Strategy (NDS) issued in January says South Korea can take primary responsibility for deterring North Korea with limited US support, and sets out a strong denial defense along the first island chain. [ 1 , 2 , 5 ]
Confirmed by several sources
- Hilbert, in an email interview with the SCMP, said US forces in Korea should not focus only on threats on the peninsula and must be ready to deploy abroad if ordered. [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]
- Hilbert said the Eighth Army is focused on the US defense commitment under the South Korea-US Mutual Defense Treaty, but that its base in Korea does not limit the missions it can carry out. [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]
- Rami Kim of the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) said South Korea is likely to provide logistics support to US forces in a regional contingency. [ 1 , 2 , 5 , 7 ]
Still unclear
- Whether any Eighth Army deployment outside the peninsula is planned. The documents report only Hilbert's statement of readiness and no specific deployment, destination or order.
- Whether Hilbert's remarks point to a Taiwan or China-related scenario. Yonhap said the remarks could be seen as hinting at this and Seoul Economic Daily said they implied mobilization in a Taiwan contingency, but the quoted remarks in the documents do not name Taiwan or China.
- The exact wording of Hilbert's quotes. The documents give Korean renderings of an English-language SCMP interview, and the wording differs between outlets, for example Newsis and Dong-A Ilbo on the missions and the global force.