South Korea to recall its ambassador to Ukraine in dispute over North Korean POWs
In short
South Korea's foreign ministry said on 8 October that the government had decided to recall its ambassador to Ukraine, Park Ki-chang (박기창), while continuing consultations with Ukraine. The move follows a dispute over Ukrainian President Zelensky's disclosure at the UN General Assembly that captured North Korean soldiers had been sent to South Korea, which Seoul says broke a non-disclosure agreement that Ukraine denies existed.
Read the full story 2 min read
South Korea's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on 8 October that the government had decided to recall its ambassador to Ukraine, Park Ki-chang (박기창). In the same statement the ministry said it hoped the issues between the two countries would be resolved smoothly and that it would continue consultations with Ukraine. Kukmin Ilbo and Chosun Ilbo reported that the embassy in Ukraine will keep working after the recall, and SBS said the timing of Park's return and the length of the recall had not been disclosed. [ 1 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 13 , 20 , 22 ]
The decision follows a dispute over the transfer of North Korean prisoners of war. According to SBS, Ukrainian President Zelensky told the UN General Assembly in New York on 23 September that two North Korean soldiers captured after fighting for Russia had recently been sent to South Korea. President Lee Jae-myung then wrote on X that Ukraine had broken a non-disclosure agreement. Chosun Ilbo reported that Dmytro Lytvyn (드미트로 리트빈), a communications adviser in Ukraine's presidential office, said on 25 September that there had been no such agreement and that hiding where a particular prisoner goes would be wrong. SBS reported that Seoul received prior notice from Ukraine but says the transfer was made public without sufficient explanation or consultation. [ 4 , 6 , 11 , 12 , 14 ]
On 27 September the presidential office issued a statement expressing strong regret and demanding an apology. On 28 September First Vice Foreign Minister Park Yoon-joo (박윤주) summoned Ukraine's chargé d'affaires, Andrii Beshkin (안드리 베쉬킨), and demanded an explanation, an apology and steps to prevent a recurrence, SBS reported. Chosun Ilbo said a senior Ukrainian official told foreign media the same day that there had been no agreement at presidential level to keep the transfer secret. On 2 October Lee wrote that Ukraine had made the other country's head of state a liar and that further measures would follow if Ukraine kept refusing to acknowledge the facts and apologise publicly. [ 1 , 4 , 6 , 11 , 12 , 14 ]
At a parliamentary audit on 6 October, Foreign Minister Cho Hyun said he had received a message from Ukraine that included words of apology but that it differed from the level Seoul had in mind. Newsis and the Korea Economic Daily quoted him as saying it needed to be checked whether the message had been reported to Ukraine's president. The presidential office said the same day that it was seriously reviewing responses including recalling the ambassador. [ 6 , 7 , 10 , 16 , 20 ]
SBS described recalling an ambassador as a measure that signals strong protest without severing relations, and Chosun Ilbo said it differs from withdrawing an embassy. Kukmin Ilbo and Chosun Ilbo wrote that the prevailing view is that a public apology from Ukraine is unlikely given national prestige. A Hankook Ilbo headline called the recall the first such step in 18 years. [ 1 , 4 , 6 , 21 ]
Why it matters
Outlets describe recalling an ambassador as a diplomatic expression of protest that stops short of cutting relations or withdrawing the embassy. The ministry's pledge to keep consulting with Ukraine was read by Newsis and SBS as leaving room for a diplomatic resolution.
Key facts
- The foreign ministry said on 8 October that the government had decided to recall its ambassador to Ukraine. [ 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 20 , 22 ]
- The ministry said it hoped the issues between the two countries would be resolved smoothly and that it would continue consultations with Ukraine. [ 1 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 16 , 20 ]
- Zelensky disclosed in his UN General Assembly speech on 23 September that North Korean prisoners of war had been sent to South Korea. [ 1 , 4 , 6 , 11 , 12 , 14 ]
- SBS and Dong-A Ilbo reported that two North Korean soldiers were sent to South Korea. [ 6 , 14 ]
- The foreign ministry summoned Ukraine's chargé d'affaires in Seoul, Andrii Beshkin (안드리 베쉬킨), on 28 September to protest. [ 4 , 6 , 11 ]
- President Lee Jae-myung said on 2 October that further measures would follow if Ukraine kept refusing to acknowledge the facts and apologise publicly. [ 1 , 4 , 11 , 12 ]
- Foreign Minister Cho Hyun said on 6 October that Ukraine had sent a message containing words of apology but that it fell short of what Seoul expected. [ 6 , 7 , 20 ]
- The South Korean embassy in Ukraine will continue operating after the ambassador's recall. [ 1 , 4 ]
Confirmed by several sources
- The South Korean government decided on 8 October to recall its ambassador to Ukraine. [ 1 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 11 , 13 , 16 , 17 , 20 , 22 ]
- The foreign ministry said it would continue consultations with Ukraine and hoped the issues would be resolved smoothly. [ 1 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 16 , 20 ]
- The dispute stems from Zelensky's 23 September UN General Assembly disclosure that North Korean prisoners had been sent to South Korea, and Ukraine's denial of a non-disclosure agreement. [ 1 , 4 , 6 , 11 , 12 , 14 ]
- Seoul summoned Ukraine's chargé d'affaires in Seoul on 28 September. [ 4 , 6 , 11 ]
- Lee Jae-myung warned on 2 October of further measures if Ukraine did not acknowledge the facts and apologise publicly. [ 1 , 4 , 11 , 12 ]
- Foreign Minister Cho Hyun said on 6 October that Ukraine's message of apology fell short of Seoul's expectations. [ 6 , 7 , 20 ]
Still unclear
- Whether a non-disclosure agreement on the prisoner transfer existed. Seoul says the two sides agreed not to disclose the transfer; Ukraine's presidential office and a senior Ukrainian official deny any such agreement.
- The ambassador's name. Most outlets name him Park Ki-chang (박기창), but the Korea Economic Daily, Dong-A Ilbo and Newsis give it as Park Hee-chang (박희창).
- When the ambassador will return and how long the recall will last. SBS reported that these details have not been disclosed.
- Whether this is South Korea's first ambassador recall in 18 years. Only a Hankook Ilbo headline makes this claim, without further detail.
- The time of the announcement. SBS said the statement came on the afternoon of 8 October, while one Kukmin Ilbo report carries an 08:23 timestamp.
What local media are saying
Timeline, local time
- Newsis runs a flash report that the foreign ministry has decided to recall the ambassador to Ukraine. [ 3 ]
- SBS reports the decision, quoting the government statement issued that afternoon. [ 6 ]
- Yonhap reports that the government has decided to recall Ambassador Park Ki-chang and will keep consulting with Ukraine. [ 13 ]
- Yonhap publishes an updated report linking the recall to Ukraine's response. [ 22 ]