Local Chorus
Local news from local sources, read in your language.
Settled
Verified

Film “Assassin(s)” Tops Korean Box Office Despite Historical Interpretation Dispute

🇰🇷 South Korea 00:01 Culture & entertainment Business3 updated 2 d ago first reported by 한국일보

In short

The Korean film “Assassin(s)” (암살자(들)), based on the 1974 shooting of First Lady Yuk Young-soo, has stayed at the top of the domestic box office into its second week, with cumulative admissions of 2,466,991 as of Oct 6. The production team issued a statement on Sept 28 saying the film does not assert a new historical conclusion or present its hypotheses as fact. The dispute has continued, with Maeil Business reporting rallies outside a cast member's home and a boycott of advertising he appears in.

Read the full story 2 min read

The Korean film “Assassin(s)” (암살자(들)) has held first place at the domestic box office into its second week despite a continuing dispute over its historical interpretation, according to box office data from the Korea Film Council's integrated ticket network cited by local outlets. [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]

Hankook Ilbo reported that as of Oct 3 at 07:00 the film had 1,894,014 cumulative admissions and ranked first overall, with daily admissions rising ahead of the National Foundation Day holiday and audience inflow continuing through word of mouth even as new titles opened. Chosun Ilbo reported that by Oct 5 at 07:00 cumulative admissions had reached 2,233,953 and the film stood first in its second week. Maeil Business reported that the film drew 54,177 admissions on Oct 6, taking cumulative admissions to 2,466,991 as of Oct 7 and leaving about 33,000 to reach 2.5 million. [ 1 , 3 , 4 ]

The film, released on Sept 23 and directed by Hur Jin-ho with Yoo Hae-jin, Park Hae-il and Lee Min-ho in leading roles, is based on the shooting of First Lady Yuk Young-soo at the Aug 15, 1974 Liberation Day ceremony. Hankook Ilbo and Maeil Business reported that a dispute over historical distortion arose after release and that arguments among audiences over the film's setting and interpretation have continued. [ 1 , 4 ]

The production team said in a Sept 28 statement that the film is “a fictional drama reconstructed by adding cinematic imagination based on various records” of the 1974 event, and that it “was not made to newly confirm a particular historical conclusion or to deny or distort existing facts.” The team added that the film does not designate any specific person as being behind the incident anywhere, and does not present its hypotheses and dramatic devices as historical facts. [ 1 , 4 ]

Maeil Business reported that the controversy spread to political circles and that rallies have been held in front of a cast member's home and a boycott campaign mounted against advertising he appears in, with no sign of the dispute subsiding. Chosun Ilbo reported separately that the film returned to first place while trading the top spot with the Japanese animation “Chiikawa”, and said its admissions were about half those of a typical holiday-period No.1 film. [ 2 , 4 ]

Why it matters

The dispute shows how a commercially successful film drawn from a real 1974 political event can move from audience argument into political circles and into protests aimed at a cast member, as Maeil Business reported. For the Korean market, the case also tests whether a controversy of this kind affects cinema attendance: Chosun Ilbo noted the film's admissions were far below those of a typical holiday No.1 title even while it returned to first place.

Key facts

  • “Assassin(s)” (암살자(들)) was released on Sept 23 and was directed by Hur Jin-ho, with Yoo Hae-jin, Park Hae-il and Lee Min-ho in leading roles. [ 4 ]
  • As of Oct 3 at 07:00, the film had 1,894,014 cumulative admissions and ranked first in the overall box office. [ 1 ]
  • As of Oct 5 at 07:00, cumulative admissions reached 2,233,953, keeping the film first in its second week. [ 3 ]
  • On Oct 6 the film drew 54,177 admissions, bringing cumulative admissions to 2,466,991 as of Oct 7, about 33,000 short of 2.5 million. [ 4 ]
  • The film is based on the shooting of First Lady Yuk Young-soo at the Aug 15, 1974 Liberation Day ceremony. [ 1 , 4 ]
  • The production team said in a Sept 28 statement that the film is a fictional drama reconstructed from various records and that it neither confirms a new historical conclusion nor denies or distorts existing facts, and does not designate any specific person as being behind the incident. [ 1 , 4 ]
  • Maeil Business reported the controversy spread to political circles, and that there were rallies in front of a cast member's home and a boycott campaign against advertising he appeared in. [ 4 ]
  • Chosun Ilbo reported the film returned to first place while trading the top spot with the Japanese animation “Chiikawa”, and that its admissions were about half those of a typical holiday-period No.1 film. [ 2 ]

Confirmed by several sources

  • “Assassin(s)” has ranked first in the overall Korean box office in its opening and second weeks. [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]
  • The production team stated that the film is a fictional drama that does not confirm a new historical conclusion or present its hypotheses and dramatic devices as historical fact. [ 1 , 4 ]

Still unclear

  • Whether the historical-interpretation dispute has affected the film's ticket sales. Documents report continued first-place rankings (1, 3, 4) while Chosun Ilbo says admissions were about half those of a typical holiday No.1 film (2); no document states a causal link between the dispute and attendance.
  • What the dispute's spread into political circles involved. Only Maeil Business mentions it, and it gives no names, parties or specific actions.
  • Whether the film will pass 2.5 million cumulative admissions. Maeil Business says it was about 33,000 short as of Oct 7; the documents contain no later figures.

What local media are saying

Business mediaThe business outlets focused on box office data from the Korea Film Council's integrated ticket network, tracking first-place rankings and admissions milestones while also reporting the historical-interpretation controversy and the production team's response. Chosun Ilbo highlighted the competition for the top spot with a Japanese animation and noted admissions were well below those of a typical holiday No.1 film; Maeil Business added the political spread and the protests and boycott calls. [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]

Timeline, local time

  1. Sept 23: “Assassin(s)” is released in theaters. [ 4 ]
  2. Sept 28: the production team issues a statement saying the film is a fictional drama based on records of a 1974 event, does not confirm a new historical conclusion, and does not present its hypotheses as historical fact. [ 1 , 4 ]
  3. Oct 3: cumulative admissions stand at 1,894,014, first in the overall box office. [ 1 ]
  4. Oct 5: cumulative admissions reach 2,233,953, first place in the film's second week. [ 3 ]
  5. Oct 7: Maeil Business reports 54,177 admissions the previous day and 2,466,991 cumulative admissions. [ 4 ]