Local Chorus
Local news from local sources, read in your language.
Settled
Verified

South Korea labour commission rules learning-materials sign-up counsellor is a worker

🇰🇷 South Korea 17:55 Policy & regulation Business7 Official updated 20 h ago first reported by 뉴시스

In short

South Korea's National Labor Relations Commission ruled that a home-based counsellor who handled sign-up calls for an online learning-materials company under a commission contract is a worker under the Labor Standards Act. It found the company's unilateral ending of the counsellor's contract to be unfair dismissal, the commission said on October 8. Outlets said it is the first time a labour commission has recognised worker status for such counsellors.

Read the full story 2 min read

South Korea's National Labor Relations Commission (중앙노동위원회) has ruled that a home-based counsellor who handled member sign-up consultations for an online learning-materials company under a commission (outsourcing) contract is a worker under the Labor Standards Act, and that the company's unilateral ending of the contract was unfair dismissal. The commission announced the decision on October 8; Newsis and Yonhap reported that it was made on August 27. All three outlets described it as the first time a labour commission has recognised worker status for commission-contract sign-up counsellors at learning-materials companies. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]

According to the commission, the counsellor, who is not named, signed and renewed one-year commission contracts with the company, an online non-face-to-face education provider, for about eight years, handling phone consultations for new members and receiving commissions based on results. Before the last contract expired, the company gave notice that it was ending the contract, citing worsening business conditions and poor performance. Yonhap and Hankook Ilbo reported that a regional labour relations commission had sided with the company when the counsellor challenged the termination as unfair dismissal. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]

On review, the national commission said it judged worker status on the actual way the work was done and the subordinate relationship with the employer rather than the form of the contract. It found the counsellor was a regular and essential part of the company's business, that the content of the work was set by the company, and that the counsellor worked for a long period at times and in ways the company set, using an electronic system the company provided, under a unified management structure. Yonhap reported a work focus period from 2 p.m. to 9 p.m.; the company's consultation rules included sanctions for not following them. The work was managed in real time through a company work phone, a call-recording system and a messenger. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]

The commission noted there was no fixed salary, but performance commissions were paid every month and regular-employee counsellors doing similar work received similar performance pay for consultations, so it treated the counsellor's pay as wages for labour. Because the counsellor had renewed one-year contracts for about eight years, it deemed the counsellor a worker without a fixed term, according to Newsis and Yonhap. Newsis and Hankook Ilbo reported that it found the termination did not meet the requirements of Article 24 of the Labor Standards Act for dismissal for managerial reasons; it cancelled the initial ruling and found unfair dismissal. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]

Commission chair Park Su-geun (박수근) said employment forms are diversifying and ways of working are changing rapidly with the shift to the digital era, and that even where a commission contract has formally been signed, the substance of how a person works needs to be examined comprehensively. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]

Why it matters

The commission said it judged worker status by how the work was actually done rather than by the form of the contract. Its chair said that as employment forms diversify in the digital era, the substance of how people work should be examined even where a commission contract was signed.

Key facts

  • The National Labor Relations Commission recognised a home-based sign-up counsellor on a commission contract with an online learning-materials company as a worker under the Labor Standards Act. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
  • The commission found the company's unilateral termination of the contract to be unfair dismissal; the ruling was made on August 27 and announced on October 8. [ 1 , 2 ]
  • It is the first time a labour commission has recognised worker status for commission-contract sign-up counsellors of learning-materials companies. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
  • The counsellor renewed one-year commission contracts for about eight years, handling phone consultations for member sign-ups and being paid commissions based on performance. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
  • The company ended the contract before it expired, citing worsening business conditions and poor performance. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
  • A regional labour relations commission had sided with the company; the national commission overturned that initial ruling. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
  • The commission found the counsellor worked under company direction, using company-provided systems, a work phone, call recording and messenger, with company rules that carried sanctions. [ 1 , 2 ]
  • The commission found the termination did not meet the requirements of Article 24 of the Labor Standards Act on dismissal for managerial reasons. [ 1 , 3 ]

Confirmed by several sources

  • The National Labor Relations Commission recognised the commission-contract sign-up counsellor as a worker and ruled the termination unfair dismissal. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
  • The decision was the first of its kind for commission-contract sign-up counsellors at learning-materials companies. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
  • The counsellor worked for about eight years on renewed one-year contracts and was paid performance commissions. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
  • The company cited worsening business conditions and poor performance in ending the contract before expiry. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
  • The ruling was made on August 27. [ 1 , 2 ]
  • The termination did not meet Article 24 requirements for dismissal for managerial reasons. [ 1 , 3 ]

Still unclear

  • The names of the counsellor and the company were not given. All outlets identify them only by letters, and they use different letters.
  • Whether the company will challenge the ruling or what remedy follows. None of the documents report the company's response or next steps.
  • The counsellor's work focus period was 2 p.m. to 9 p.m. Reported only by Yonhap.

What local media are saying

Business mediaNewsis and Hankook Ilbo reported the ruling as a first, stressing that the commission looked at actual working practice over contract form, the eight years of renewals, and the finding that the termination failed Labor Standards Act Article 24. [ 1 , 3 ]
Official sourcesYonhap detailed the commission's reasoning, including the 2 p.m. to 9 p.m. focus hours, real-time monitoring, the earlier regional ruling for the company, and the chair's call to judge the substance of work. [ 2 ]

Timeline, local time

  1. Newsis and Yonhap report the commission's announcement of the ruling. [ 1 , 2 ]
  2. Hankook Ilbo reports the ruling and the chair's comments. [ 3 ]